An innovative training post in medical writing.

ST2 GP trainees at the Imperial College London GP Specialty Training Programme have the opportunity of amalgamating a 6-month general practice placement with an Innovative Training Post (ITP) of our choice. Rather than choose a more typical ITP such as rheumatology, oncology, or diabetes, I decided to explore the world of medical writing. Medical writing is not something most GP trainees will have had much exposure to. It is not a part of the medical school curriculum, so, at most, the typical trainee may have participated in a research project or audit that eventually leads to a publication. I certainly had no prior experience of medical writing, or writing in general for that matter. But I harboured an unfulfilled childhood fantasy of becoming an author, reporter, or TV presenter. This led me down the path of choosing an experience in the domain of medical writing. My first assignment was a 4-week placement at the British Journal of General Practice. This post enabled me to understand the role of an editor and the process of article publication from initial submission through to final acceptance. I was also able to conduct my own small-scale research project. As someone with good intentions to read medical journals and keep up to date with the latest developments in medicine, I often found myself struggling to keep up with the steadily increasing pile of journals appearing on my doormat every month. I was keen to know if I was the only GP trainee falling into this black hole of underdeveloped and over-enthusiastic plans of career improvement through self-education. I decided to conduct a qualitative analysis of the use of the BJGP among trainees. Using semi-structured interviews I explored the views of 11 GP trainees towards the BJGP and asked whether it is relevant to their stage of training. The results showed that although the journal was familiar to trainees, it was not frequently read, and very often not their journal of choice. It was also not viewed as educationally relevant as InnovAiT. Importantly, it was often read less frequently owing to poor visual appeal, occasionally even being labelled 'stodgy' and 'overcrowded'. The study suggested a need for changes to the design and layout of the journal. It also needs to be available in an app format to increase readership among trainee GPs. From the BJGP I moved to a 2-week placement at Pulse. This experience was …